- Thread starter
- #21
Vasdef
Well-Known Member
It was either purple kush or super skunk. (Cat mixed the seeds up. He meant well)Yes - K is potassium
Was your last grow the same strain as the current one?
This grow, Wedding Cake.
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was either purple kush or super skunk. (Cat mixed the seeds up. He meant well)Yes - K is potassium
Was your last grow the same strain as the current one?
Yeah, I dont know what happened. User error most likely. I just looked at the back of the bottle.7.5ml/gal each of just the 3-part (no CalMag) provides:
165 ppm N
58 P
205 K
121 Ca
57 Mg
I like these numbers better.
Yes - I think it’s just too muchSo you're suggesting omit the calmag for now?
Rexer,Hey Rexer,
I'm not home right now, but what I can tell you is the Calmag bottle is the exact same shape, size as the hydroguard.
NPK? Never heard of it. My horns are still green over here.
I like that cooler idea. I'll be bouncing that idea in my noggin today.
I am not sure where you are getting these numbers from but I do not think they are right.7.5ml/gal each of just the 3-part (no CalMag) provides:
165 ppm N
58 P
205 K
121 Ca
57 Mg
I like these numbers better.
Thanks for taking the time to come up with those numbers. Looking through your post, I might as well be trying to read Swahili. All that confuses the hell out of me, sorry.I am not sure where you are getting these numbers from but I do not think they are right.
So based on the GH three-part series they list k20 as 11%. We need to convert that to K before in order to get the ppms of K added to a gallon of water.
To convert this is 11x0.83 = 9.13%. K = 9.13
We have to do something similar for P205 to P.
6 x 0.43 = 2.58%. P = 2.58%
To figure out how much ppm this adds to a gallon of water if we add 7.5ml of the 3 parts, we need to take 1000ml / 3.78L = 264. Now we can solve for ppm per gallon of water.
Then solve for ppm of K: 7.5ml x 9.13% x 264 = 180ppm
Solve for ppm of P: 7.5ml x 2.58% x 264 = 51ppm
N: 7.5ml x 7% x 264 = 138ppm
Ca 7.5ml x 5% x 264 = 99ppm
Mg 7.5ml x 2% x 264 = 39ppm
N 138ppm
P 51ppm
K 205ppm
Ca 99ppm
Mg 39ppm
I would like mag between 50-75ppm and calcium around 110ppm. Nitrogen is a bit low as well. P is great at 51,and K at 205. Adding a few ml of calmag will bring these numbers right in line. I would shoot for N 150ppm.
Your other numbers seem way off as well for his 5mL calmagic and 10ml 3 part series. For example, let's just take the K, which we know is 9.13%.
So 10ml x 9.13% x 264 = 241ppm. 241 is actually fine for mid to late flower.
So solve for calcium at 5ml per gallon of calimagic so 5% calcium, and then 10ml of the three-part series and also 5% calcium, we need to do the following. We can add the ml 5+10 and get 15ml
Then 15ml x 5% x 264 = 198ppm - that is getting a bit high, but not as high as you thought it was. Cannabis is a lot like tomatoes, which can handle a lot of calcium.
Thanks PS!Vas, yeah, no problem. I understand. That was for Felipeblu as proof of what is the accurate ppms. All you need to know is if you use 7.5ml of all three parts, the proper ppms you end up with are
N 138ppm
P 51ppm
K 205ppm
Ca 99ppm
Mg 39ppm
BTW, you can get better numbers using just Micro and Bloom, so you don't have to buy the grow, thus saving money. The lukas formula is pretty good, but the following is better. 10ml Micro and 16ml Bloom. This gives you the following ppms
N 132ppm
P 90ppm
K 161ppm
Ca 132ppm
Mg 63ppm
S 42ppm
You can use this for the whole grow. Just cut it in half with water for the beginning.
I use my own spreadsheet.I am not sure where you are getting these numbers from but I do not think they are right.
Yes, this is total K2O percentage, but see below re density.So based on the GH three-part series they list k20 as 11%
Yep, I considered the actual elemental percentages for K and P.We need to convert that to K before in order to get the ppms of K added to a gallon of water.
To convert this is 11x0.83 = 9.13%. K = 9.13
We have to do something similar for P205 to P.
6 x 0.43 = 2.58%. P = 2.58%
All of this is correct to this point. Except that it is essential to consider the density of the liquids to finish the calculations.To figure out how much ppm this adds to a gallon of water if we add 7.5ml of the 3 parts, we need to take 1000ml / 3.78L = 264. Now we can solve for ppm per gallon of water.
Then solve for ppm of K: 7.5ml x 9.13% x 264 = 180ppm
Solve for ppm of P: 7.5ml x 2.58% x 264 = 51ppm
N: 7.5ml x 7% x 264 = 138ppm
Ca 7.5ml x 5% x 264 = 99ppm
Mg 7.5ml x 2% x 264 = 39ppm
N 138ppm
P 51ppm
K 205ppm
Ca 99ppm
Mg 39ppm
See above re density - percentages from different products cannot be combined.I would like mag between 50-75ppm and calcium around 110ppm. Nitrogen is a bit low as well. P is great at 51,and K at 205. Adding a few ml of calmag will bring these numbers right in line. I would shoot for N 150ppm.
Your other numbers seem way off as well for his 5mL calmagic and 10ml 3 part series. For example, let's just take the K, which we know is 9.13%.
So 10ml x 9.13% x 264 = 241ppm. 241 is actually fine for mid to late flower.
So solve for calcium at 5ml per gallon of calimagic so 5% calcium, and then 10ml of the three-part series and also 5% calcium, we need to do the following. We can add the ml 5+10 and get 15ml
5ml/gal of CaliMagic (density = 1.14kg/946ml = 1.2) = 5ml x 5% x 2.64 x 1.2 = 79ppmThen 15ml x 5% x 264 = 198ppm - that is getting a bit high, but not as high as you thought it was. Cannabis is a lot like tomatoes, which can handle a lot of calcium.
i tried hydro growing once. i got all the proper equipment. tried it once, lost the whole 8 plants by overfeeding , said F it and learned to love dirt.Thanks for taking the time to come up with those numbers. Looking through your post, I might as well be trying to read Swahili. All that confuses the hell out of me, sorry.
Many have followed the Lucas formula, but I wouldn’t advise doing this. The P is getting pretty high (I get 106ppm P for this) which can cause antagonistic effects wrt uptake of K, Ca, and Fe. Plus, too much P has been linked to excessive stem growth (greater internodal distance = leggy plants).Vas, yeah, no problem. I understand. That was for Felipeblu as proof of what is the accurate ppms. All you need to know is if you use 7.5ml of all three parts, the proper ppms you end up with are
N 138ppm
P 51ppm
K 205ppm
Ca 99ppm
Mg 39ppm
BTW, you can get better numbers using just Micro and Bloom, so you don't have to buy the grow, thus saving money. The lukas formula is pretty good, but the following is better. 10ml Micro and 16ml Bloom. This gives you the following ppms
N 132ppm
P 90ppm
K 161ppm
Ca 132ppm
Mg 63ppm
S 42ppm
You can use this for the whole grow. Just cut it in half with water for the beginning.
Yes, the whole mass is a uniform tan.tan roots?
i tried hydro growing once. i got all the proper equipment. tried it once, lost the whole 8 plants by overfeeding , said F it and learned to love dirt.