FeloniousPunk
Well-Known Member
Read The Task Force report on the legalization of cannabis in Canada. Guys thats is the group of people the Government appointed to research and then give a report to the Government on how to legalize Cannabis in Canada and all that. It has a section for medical cannabis. They specify that in order to keep the legitimacy of patients using cannabis for real medical purposes, the current legislation must still exist or a new legislation must come into force when the new law comes in legalizing it for everyone. The reason for this is to ensure patients are not being seen as just another "pot smoker" so to speak. They did a huge survey as well as a ton of research from multiple countries who have already legalized it(including the states in the US.) Its a good read but if u dont read it all, it is long, read the medical cannabis chapter at least. Stay informed people. Also it does not say you will be inspected no matter what, it says they have the right to come and inspect whenever they want doesnt mean they will come visit you every month. There is a reason why the ACMPR is there and they say it is working and it should stay or replace with something similar to protect patients. Research it and read before jumping the gun guys.
Thanks for the input npstrs.
I have read the Task Force report and refer to it as often as needed. I was hoping to establish if they have ever inspected anyone. I suspect they have because I saw application stats that said they had rejected several hundred ( I think the number was in the mid 300's).
And yes if they follow the report, MMJ will be protected. Here are the recommendations of the Task Force regarding medical cannabis:
The Task Force recommends that the federal government:
•Maintain a separate medical access framework to support patients
•Monitor and evaluate patients' reasonable access to cannabis for medical purposes through the implementation of the new system, with action as required to ensure that the market provides reasonable affordability and availability and that regulations provide authority for measures that may be needed to address access issues
•Review the role of designated persons under the ACMPR with the objective of eliminating this category of producer
•Apply the same tax system for medical and non-medical cannabis products
•Promote and support pre-clinical and clinical research on the use of cannabis and cannabinoids for medical purposes, with the aim of facilitating submissions of cannabis-based products for market authorization as drugs
•Support the development and dissemination of information and tools for the medical community and patients on the appropriate use of cannabis for medical purposes
•Evaluate the medical access framework in five years
The last recommendation along with the elimination of the designated grower (if I'm reading this right) are the issues that concern me most. I believe the review in five years is in response to the position of the CMA (and the Federation of Medical Regulatory Authorities of Canada, the national association representing medical regulators).
The Canadian Medical Association wants physicians out of the programme. This is probably the biggest opposition to MMJ. The CMA doesn't feel they have enough scientific evidence for their members to prescribe cannabis.
Here is the link for the Task Force Report:
A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada
You can click on "Chapter 5: Medical Access" if you don't want to read the whole report.
Peace.