- Thread starter
- #161
SashaShiva
Well-Known Member
Also,
I am going to be teaching people how to do a ton of stuff in Court. I have learned a lot about the Courts and Federal Courts over the past few years. I always had my County Case open from 2010, where I had been Illegally Arrested for Practicing my Religion, and with no Warrant on my own Property.
But then in 2015, in Austin, I had a ton of things Confiscated (as explained in Gallagher v. Austin PD) and then the Police Department removed the Case to Federal Court, which then taught me about the Federal Court.
And I started filing in Federal Court, and talking to Federal Agencies Directly. I had always emailed the Media, and Congress People, but they can ignore emails.
Here is an example of the kinds of things I will be teaching everyone. This is a Case that I filed in 2017, in Dallas, the first Case I filed in Federal Court against the DEA.
That Case was filed in 2017, and the Judges had it under Review for a Year, at which point I think they thought I had forgotten about it and they could just let it sit open, but instead I filed a "Motion to show cause" and asked the Court to show Cause. It had been an Entire year, and about 2 days after I filed the Motion for the Court to show Cause, they responded with the Shortest most Pathetic little Magistrate Response saying "You can't sue the Agency, you have to sue the people" and that was after I filed an Administrative Claim and the DEA didn't respond.
So then I started the DEA Religious Petition Process.
And I sued the DEA Again, but this time, Agents I had been talking to through emails for over a Year.
Then I used the SBA Ombudsman to force them to respond.
And then the DEA gave me a response to my Administrative Claim and said I could sue them for $5.6m
So now, I reopened the Case from 2017, and did this by filing an "Amended Complaint" which you always have a Right to. If you have a Case dismissed, you can come back 30 Years later and file an Amended Complaint, so even if you can't win a Case, and don't have all the Facts, get it on Record so you don't miss filing deadlines, because you can always come back later.
Filing Amended Complaints is something I learned by reading an old Black Panther Case
Wahad v. FBI, 994 F. Supp. 237 (S.D.N.Y. 1998
I am going to be teaching people how to do a ton of stuff in Court. I have learned a lot about the Courts and Federal Courts over the past few years. I always had my County Case open from 2010, where I had been Illegally Arrested for Practicing my Religion, and with no Warrant on my own Property.
But then in 2015, in Austin, I had a ton of things Confiscated (as explained in Gallagher v. Austin PD) and then the Police Department removed the Case to Federal Court, which then taught me about the Federal Court.
And I started filing in Federal Court, and talking to Federal Agencies Directly. I had always emailed the Media, and Congress People, but they can ignore emails.
Here is an example of the kinds of things I will be teaching everyone. This is a Case that I filed in 2017, in Dallas, the first Case I filed in Federal Court against the DEA.
Gallagher v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al (3:17-cv-00734), Texas Northern District Court
Gallagher v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al (3:17-cv-00734), Texas Northern District Court, Filed: 03/14/2017
www.pacermonitor.com
That Case was filed in 2017, and the Judges had it under Review for a Year, at which point I think they thought I had forgotten about it and they could just let it sit open, but instead I filed a "Motion to show cause" and asked the Court to show Cause. It had been an Entire year, and about 2 days after I filed the Motion for the Court to show Cause, they responded with the Shortest most Pathetic little Magistrate Response saying "You can't sue the Agency, you have to sue the people" and that was after I filed an Administrative Claim and the DEA didn't respond.
So then I started the DEA Religious Petition Process.
And I sued the DEA Again, but this time, Agents I had been talking to through emails for over a Year.
Gallagher v. Dhillon et al (3:18-cv-02801), Texas Northern District Court
Gallagher v. Dhillon et al (3:18-cv-02801), Texas Northern District Court, Filed: 10/22/2018
www.pacermonitor.com
Then I used the SBA Ombudsman to force them to respond.
And then the DEA gave me a response to my Administrative Claim and said I could sue them for $5.6m
So now, I reopened the Case from 2017, and did this by filing an "Amended Complaint" which you always have a Right to. If you have a Case dismissed, you can come back 30 Years later and file an Amended Complaint, so even if you can't win a Case, and don't have all the Facts, get it on Record so you don't miss filing deadlines, because you can always come back later.
Filing Amended Complaints is something I learned by reading an old Black Panther Case
Wahad v. FBI, 994 F. Supp. 237 (S.D.N.Y. 1998
Wahad v. FBI, 994 F. Supp. 237 (S.D.N.Y. 1998)
Wahad v. FBI, 994 F. Supp. 237 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) case opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
law.justia.com