My girls
- Thread starter Gangamane
- Start date
I hope you don't mind a suggestion: When taking plant pictures to show others, it is extremely helpful to turn off the blurple thing, and use practically any other light source - camera/phone light, lamp, overhead ceiling light, flashlight, Colemas gas lantern...
- Thread starter
- #3
Thank you!
I have color-perceprion issues. Didn't want you to think I was an @sshole. (I am, lol, but I try to hide it.)
I have color-perceprion issues. Didn't want you to think I was an @sshole. (I am, lol, but I try to hide it.)
- Thread starter
- #5
cbdhemp808
Well-Known Member
lookin' good! how tall is your tent?
- Thread starter
- #7
Gas lantern lol thanks tortured I almost spit my coffee out lol
@Gangamane nice garden you got there...are they all the same age? If the are the g.f and pbb are looking like they're gonna be some hefty ladies.... Keep up the good work
Forgot about the Coleman lanterns. We spent many weekends up at the cabin and Colman fuel (white gas) lanterns was the light of choice. As far as I can tell Coleman no longer makes or even lists the lantern or parts on their website or catalogs. I can't find listings on their websites for the Guide Series camping stoves either and those things were the next best thing to a full size stove when set up on our patio.
Anyway, yes, white light instead of the purple or red grow lights. The white light has a few other benefits in taking pictures. One of them is that the digital cameras will be able to focus better which makes it easier to see the details in the pictures.
And, the purple light, or heavy reds, hide some major problems. One big one is the small scars or damage done to leaves by mites or thrips will not show up very well under purple.
Being a hobbyist grower I took a plant with a mite infection and moved it to another out of the way room in the basement, set up the purple light, and after 4 weeks took photos under the colored light and then just the room light. The amount of damage done by the mites which was only noticeable under the white light was astounding.
- Thread starter
- #10
Happyhazmat yes they are all the same age. What trips me out is the fact that the g.f. looks naked compare to the rest but she has a lot of bud sites.. I'm current in week 3 of flower but not noticing alot of trichs..Gas lantern lol thanks tortured I almost spit my coffee out lol
@Gangamane nice garden you got there...are they all the same age? If the are the g.f and pbb are looking like they're gonna be some hefty ladies.... Keep up the good work
Friggin sweet yea your gonna have some monster ladies....they may not look like much now but they'll get there..... 5-7 more weeks of growth to go ...anything is possible
- Thread starter
- #12
That is very true.. I just hope it comes out really good . I don't think I'm doing to bad for my first grow
Not at all....your doing great...what ever your doing keep it up.
- Thread starter
- #14
- Thread starter
- #15
Most of the sites should swell enough and grow to touch....so looks good from my house
cbdhemp808
Well-Known Member
cool... 6.7 ft. what is the current distance from top of your plants to your light(s)?
- Thread starter
- #18
cbdhemp808
Well-Known Member
This pic makes it look like you've got a lot more that 24". Are your light(s) at max height?
- Thread starter
- #20
No they are not.. when the lights come on in the morning I'll take a better pic
