Brianet1222
420 Member
I have a northern lights auto going on 12 weeks and using 1,000 watt led for the first time should be almost done not sure
What do you think Northern Lights auto going on 12 weeks
- Thread starter Brianet1222
- Start date
Sorry, not even close to finished. Too many white hairs. Probably another 4 weeks judging from how they look.
- Thread starter
- #3
Brianet1222
420 Member
Okay thank you even though it’s at 12 weeks and I have a gelato auto I’ll post picturesI have a northern lights auto going on 12 weeks and using 1,000 watt led for the first time should be almost done not sure
I just finished a NL auto that didn't auto. After about 80 days I had to change the light schedule to get it to flower. Then flowering took another 100 days or so. So my "quickie auto" occupied my tent for half a year. Sometimes things happen.
- Thread starter
- #5
Brianet1222
420 Member
Wow yeah that’s not that quick this my 2nd time growing auto first time was was not so good but this is my first time with led
Looks like a little re veg went on.
DV8
Well-Known Member
Farside got you covered on timing.
The more I look at this plant pic though the more head scratching Im doing.
What genetics are these? Im interested as something seems not quite accurate. Those three finger fan leaves, and the sativa like look to them doesnt scream NL auto. And 12 weeks to be so far away seems odd.
I could be wrong, but if it was just a generic pic Id almost say reveg or some weird duckfoot thing going on, in a sativa leaning girl. Either the auto cross is off, throwing it that way, a mutant, or my 3rd and most likely guess a sativa photo thats had a reveg.
Sorry to jump in, if it was my grow Id be just marvelling at her weirdness. Nothing about that full plant pic says classic Northern lights to me.
The more I look at this plant pic though the more head scratching Im doing.
What genetics are these? Im interested as something seems not quite accurate. Those three finger fan leaves, and the sativa like look to them doesnt scream NL auto. And 12 weeks to be so far away seems odd.
I could be wrong, but if it was just a generic pic Id almost say reveg or some weird duckfoot thing going on, in a sativa leaning girl. Either the auto cross is off, throwing it that way, a mutant, or my 3rd and most likely guess a sativa photo thats had a reveg.
Sorry to jump in, if it was my grow Id be just marvelling at her weirdness. Nothing about that full plant pic says classic Northern lights to me.
Welcome New Members - Please Read Before Posting
This thread has been moved to Frequently Asked Questions.
We work hard to make 420 Magazine as navigable as possible for members and guests so that information can be easily found. We also want to ensure that your own thread receives the most appropriate responses, views or support.
- Thread starter
- #9
Brianet1222
420 Member
I got from Quebec seed bank okay think it could be from led lights cuz here’s a picture of my gelato auto
- Thread starter
- #10
Brianet1222
420 Member
Same time frameI got from Quebec seed bank okay think it could be from led lights cuz here’s a picture of my gelato auto
It does at that. Plus it is the second thread I have seen today that has an auto that looks like it has started to re-vegetate.
Vegan4life
Well-Known Member
I wonder what would cause a Auto to re-veg???
ruderalis expression being overwhelmed by the other strains bred in. it isn't strong enough so it can revert under an auto light sched. dropping daylight hrs under 18 should straighten it out.
Vegan4life
Well-Known Member
Got it! Unstable genetics... Thank you!
it's a dance. breeder probably was working to bring thc or another trait up, shoving the ruderalis further back.
I'd agree with bluter. The 3 finger leaves is a trait of the ruderalis strain. Came across it in an article a while back.
Sorry I'd say it's possibly got a lot of ruderalis expressing if it's got all 3 fingered leaves. Wouldn't explain why it's going so long though.
Sorry I'd say it's possibly got a lot of ruderalis expressing if it's got all 3 fingered leaves. Wouldn't explain why it's going so long though.
I have seen many times genetics do not take enough ruderalis. I have seen some not even auto flower and some flower but need 12/12 or they re veg in some branches. As soon as I see any flowering autos not looking right by habit I change lights to 12/12. If I see them doing good then I run 18/6. On my last auto run I am sure I talked about a couple of them would not flower in my video series and maybe here. Hope that explains a little better. I wish you the best take care.
- Thread starter
- #18
Brianet1222
420 Member
Thank you for the info
actually it does. it's the photo side of the equation causing it to revert, not the ruderalis side.
dropping the daylight sched to 12 / 12 straightens it out and caters to the photo side.
DV8
Well-Known Member
I think you lot got to the bottom of this one, been some insightful info here. Answered a bunch of questions I would never have thought to ask.
Thanks.
Thanks.
