- Thread starter
- #401
Governmentchz
Well-Known Member
O.K., I don't want to break this down into a pissing match, so put your peckers away.
I liked my mars II 700, and am passing it on to a burgeoning grower who has a couple 2x3 tents already, but could benefit from a move to LED. He's been using T5's and cfl's previously and is broke as a joke, so I'm paying it forward. The big hempy is in a 2x3 tent right now as well Grizz, and upcanning in hempy can be moot as long as you adjust feeding/watering with her needs. It can be a pain in the ass if you have limited time to tend your garden because it's a matter of increasing the frequency and rhythm.
There's no jury out here. As I've said before, no one's results are more convincing to me than my own, and I try quite hard to be as transparent and honest as I can in my observations. This P300 is a sweet-ass photon source for my plant's photosynthetic needs. It's better than my mars II 700. Of that I am sure.
I liked my mars II 700, and am passing it on to a burgeoning grower who has a couple 2x3 tents already, but could benefit from a move to LED. He's been using T5's and cfl's previously and is broke as a joke, so I'm paying it forward. The big hempy is in a 2x3 tent right now as well Grizz, and upcanning in hempy can be moot as long as you adjust feeding/watering with her needs. It can be a pain in the ass if you have limited time to tend your garden because it's a matter of increasing the frequency and rhythm.
There's no jury out here. As I've said before, no one's results are more convincing to me than my own, and I try quite hard to be as transparent and honest as I can in my observations. This P300 is a sweet-ass photon source for my plant's photosynthetic needs. It's better than my mars II 700. Of that I am sure.