Been real quiet on the “new species” front.
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry, I didn’t read the poll I searched it.Thanks for bringing this back up. The community has voted.
No issues at all sir. I had totally forgotten about this thread and it will more than likely be closed as the votes have shown the majority disagree with the OPs purported findings.
Six to four is a majority but not much of one with only 10 people voting at this moment..No issues at all sir. I had totally forgotten about this thread and it will more than likely be closed as the votes have shown the majority disagree with the OPs purported findings.
I agree. He's never really followed up on his original claims so maybe he's quietly realizing he overstepped a bit.The idea of closing this thread for "spreading false information" really bothers me. Seems pretty harmless (and quite entertaining in a "Do you believe in aliens?" kind of way). Maybe just move it miscellaneous or something?
There’s two ways one could look at this, yes it might be harmless. But why is @420 Magazine allowing something that they know is b.s. to continue to be spreading misinformation? IMO CLThe idea of closing this thread for "spreading false information" really bothers me. Seems pretty harmless (and quite entertaining in a "Do you believe in aliens?" kind of way). Maybe just move it miscellaneous or something?
Because that's how science is done and new discoveries are made. Someone goes way out on a limb and proves to all the naysayers that they have, in fact, discovered something new.There’s two ways one could look at this, yes it might be harmless. But why is @420 Magazine allowing something that they know is b.s. to continue to be spreading misinformation? IMO CL
I didn’t say do this or do that but what I did say was that there was two ways of looking at it. That’s my opinion and you have yours and that’s what free speech is all about. But you still can’t yell fire in a theater if there’s not one. CLBecause that's how science is done and new discoveries are made. Someone goes way out on a limb and proves to all the naysayers that they have, in fact, discovered something new.
So, if we censor someone from making their claims we're no better than governments censoring what can and cannot be said in an effort to control their populations. You know, free speech and all that. Plus, what's he hurting by making his claim? Nothing.
If this is B.S. it will be revealed in due time either with his "proof" which we can all evaluate, or because it disappears from the conversation.
The OP said he would do another grow this spring and once again show us proof. So, let him do it. It would be quite the discovery if he's right.
And I hope he is.
Because that could end up hurting people.But you still can’t yell fire in a theater if there’s not one. CL
I never said that he was,all I said was that there was two ways of looking at it. CL Edit: And you don’t know that he isn’t!Because that could end up hurting people.
If I say the sky is purple, not blue, what does that hurt anyone else? And, maybe I live in a place where there's some funky ground vents spewing vapors into the air and that is my reality. Or maybe I'm color blind and can't tell the difference.
You don't know that's he's spreading false information, that's just your opinion. Until he provides more background there's no proof either way.
Amen to that. CLFree speech is lovely and I work to protect it by trying to be honest. That means me telling the truth. I expect and demand the same. When intentional lying comes into play I say end it. No lies! This weakens us all as a group! This person has not, and history tells me liars are here for themselves and not for the collective.
None of us know. And that's the whole point. He was very enthused with his new discovery when he brought it forward. We asked for more detail and proof, he said he'd do another grow this spring and give us all another chance to be dazzled by his discovery (paraphrasing here obv.)Edit: And you don’t know that he isn’t!
Himself. At least that is the way I see it.Plus, what's he hurting by making his claim? Nothing.
Part of the problem is that he seems to be unfamiliar with the basics of plants, species and The Tree of Life as used by science. Most likely he is confusing a new Marijuana strain or cultivar as if it were a "new specie". And he implies that they can be cross breed with each other in another message.From msg #1: " I call this new species of marijuana plant cross over because it can cross over in all three plants and cannot be a hybrid it a whole mutated plant it self with a whole other different family tree of plant species..."