- Thread starter
- #1,221
I think your point about nitrogen is well-written and really got right to the core of the one nutrient dilemma because it does seem like a paradox. If a plant can just take up what it needs when it needs it during different phases of growth like Mega Crop’s website claims then why do plants burn from being over fertilized? Good point.
And I want to emphasize that I give Asesino a lot of credit for the plants he is producing and for his groundbreaking work with quadining because the only way to improve things is to experiment and obviously he is an admirable avid experimenter.
Obviously, everyone wants the biggest most potent buds they can get but in the real world, there is a cost both financial and timewise and I am really trying to get to the bottom of if these very involved intricate feeding systems are worth it so I wonder what kinds of increased yields are people getting with them as opposed to a Mega Crop kind of single supplement?
I really believe that you should essential have a base nutrient (3 part, 2 part whatever part) plus a root booster and a PK booster. Certain additives might be overkill or not worth the money to people but these should be in every growers arsenal. Hard to measure what each additives does and to what effect but molasses is a great example. Ever since I've used it the plants have had more frost. I can see it but I can't scientifically measure it. Silica makes them stronger and I can feel the difference in my fingers between how much harder they feel and flop over less. A lot of the additives have just come through trying them out and noticing a difference between a prior grow without them and the new grow with them. If I can actually see the difference then I keep using it. I think for 4-5 grows I would buy an additive at a time so I didn't fork out a ton of money at once and just try them out and eventually this was the lineup I use.